Skoči na vsebino

Kitajska - počasi se vrača v svojo zgodovinsko vlogo najbolj napredne države sveta


Kruz

Priporočeni prispevki

Na Kitajskem ena nuklearka nekej nagaja

 

Samo zdej ne vem komu verjet?

 

Navedek

Exclusive: US assessing reported leak at Chinese nuclear power facility

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/06/14/politics/china-nuclear-reactor-leak-us-monitoring/index.html

 

 

Navedek

Nuclear plant in China refutes report of radiation leak warning, says indicators ‘normal’

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/06/14/china-nuclear-plant-leak/

 

Navedek

China nuclear plant ‘leak’: US says it is investigating reports of incident at Guangdong facility

https://news.yahoo.com/china-nuclear-plant-leak-us-120055420.html

 

Navedek

Incident v kitajski jedrski elektrarni: francoski solastnik ZDA zaprosil za pomoč

https://www.24ur.com/novice/tujina/incident-v-kitajski-jedrski-elektrarni-francoski-solastnik-zda-zaprosil-za-pomoc.html

 

Kje je zdej un kloven, ki jih je prov zagovarjal? Naj pove več. Še s Francosko pomočjo jim ne rata nekaj orenk skup spravt

uredilo bitje smarnca
Povezava do prispevka

Kitajci so zasluženo na vrhu. Sestavil so se. Zahod jim je pomagal (Pač vsi hočemo imeti naj in najbolje za male pare). Kitajska je kar nekaj ljudi žrtvovala ter naravo za vse to. Izstavlja račune in ne bo se pustil jebat od drugih.  

Drugače, ko poslujem s kitajci to so res jebevetri. Dost težko je z njimi.  

Povezava do prispevka
smarnca reče Dne, 14. 6. 2021 at 15:44:

Na Kitajskem ena nuklearka nekej nagaja

 

Samo zdej ne vem komu verjet?

 

Kje je zdej un kloven, ki jih je prov zagovarjal? Naj pove več. Še s Francosko pomočjo jim ne rata nekaj orenk skup spravt

Če si slučajno mislil mene. :)

Poškodovane ali počene gorilne palice so relativno pogost problem. Če se to ne bi zgodilo na Kitajskem, ne bi CNN nikoli poročal o tem in ostali mediji ne bi kliknili copy/paste na CNN poročilo.

Poskusi najti to novico na CNN, BBC:

https://www.24ur.com/novice/gospodarstvo/v-nuklearki-poskodba-gorivne-palice-uprava-miri-da-ni-nevarnosti.html

 

Tu gre za podobno zgodbo, s tem da ima Kitajska malce več ovir zaradi Ameriških sankcij.

 

Navedek

Background
On 14 June, CNN in the United States reported that it had received information that
Taishan Nuclear Power Plant in Guangdong Province, China, was experiencing a
radiation release. This information came by way of a memo prepared by Framatome, a
subsidy of the French utility EDF, in an application to the United States Department of
Energy to do work on Taishan NPP. EDF is a 30% equity stakeholder in the plant and
Framatome is a technical services provider and reactor designer.


Why did Framatome submit documents to the US DOE?
The Taishan Nuclear Power Plant is majority-owned by China General Nuclear Power
Company (CGNPC) via a 70% ownership stake of the plant’s holding company. CGNPC
is currently sanctioned by the United States government by placement on the Entity List,
which forbids US firms and personnel to do work for CGNPC and disallows technical
data or other operating information from the US to be distributed to CGNPC.
Framatome applied for an exemption to this regulation, on the basis that their work for
CGNPC was necessary to ensure “operational safety” of the plant. Operational Safety
is a well-established exemption condition for the United States’ nuclear export ban to
CGNPC. Framatome applied for this exemption because it hoped to consult with
Framatome personnel from its US-based office to perform work for CGNPC. This
application for exemption was denied, indicating US DOE and regulatory authority
authorities did not consider the situation to constitute a sufficient risk to operational
safety to justify granting an exemption.


What we know about what is going on at Taishan NPP
On Wednesday, June 16, China’s National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) put out
a press release.1
 The press release states that Taishan has experienced five failure
(broken) fuel rods, comprising .01% of the 60,000 fuel rods in the core. This matches a
statement from EDF stating that the work they hoped to perform in Taishan was an
“operational issue” related to noble gas build up due to damaged fuel rods. Cracked
fuel rods are an undesirable but not uncommon phenomena in the nuclear industry.
Most plants have them; some have many. A multi-year pan-industry effort in the USA
has reduced fuel leaks nearly to zero, but this is an exceptional case. Most nuclear
power industries, including China, exhibit some number of cases of cracked fuel rods.

Chinese: http://www.mee.gov.cn/ywdt/zbft/202106/t20210616_839172.shtml

 

How does a failed fuel rod lead to higher radiation levels?
When a rod is broken, it releases fission gases that were previously contained within the
fuel cladding, allowing them to circulate in the cooling water. Radioactive Xenon-133 (a
noble gas) is the most likely element to escape and find its way into the primary coolant
loop, where its presence alerts plant operators as to the existence of a broken fuel rod.


Can the plant still operate, or will it have to be shut down to mitigate the
issue?

NPPs usually can continue operating with damaged fuel rods in the core and do not
require shutting the reactor down or changing the power output. A novel failure
mechanism could prompt a shutdown, but there’s insufficient evidence at this time to
suggest that Taishan has experienced such a case.


Are damaged fuel rods dangerous?
Typically, damaged or cracked fuel rods (called failed fuel rods) are not considered to be
especially dangerous, but they do require the plant owner to take extra steps to manage
the damaged fuel while continuing to operate the plant. It is a technical challenge for the
plant operator or a technical service firm working on the issue because it requires the
plant to be operated differently until the broken rod can be removed (which would be
during the next reactor refueling outrage, usually once every 18 months). Broken fuel
rods are generally not considered problems serious enough to stop the plant. The US,
French, and Chinese authorities have all issued statements expressing that there is no
indication of imminent danger from Taishan. And as we noted above, the fact that US
DOE has turned down a request for an exemption from the US government restrictions
applying to business dealing with CGN, would support the notion that the current
situation is not serious, unless there are more details that haven’t yet been revealed.


CNN reported that Framatome’s memo to the US government showed
China’s regulatory authority had doubled the allowable level of radiation
to allow the plant to continue operating in excess of allowable levels.
What is known about this?

The Wednesday press release from the NNSA denied this statement and asserts that
this is a misreading of the plant’s operating procedures. NNSA stated that their
organization had approving a doubling of the level of inert gas to be used in the plant’s
primary coolant loop chemistry, related to operations management, not radioactivity
release. At the time of publishing, no statement had been made by Framatome/EDF
about those allegations. However, there is no indication from gamma radiation detection
around the plant, or from testing sites in Hong Kong, that environmental radiation in the
greater Taishan plant area is higher than usual.2

2 Source: Hong Kong Observatory; CGN, NNSA and AFP

https://www.lantaugroup.com/publications/display/A-Perspective-on-the-Taishan-Nuclear-Plant

 

Še preveden press release:

Navedek

Recently, CNN’s report on Taishan Nuclear Power Plant has attracted public attention. To this end, the relevant person in charge of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment's (National Nuclear Safety Administration) has answered questions from reporters on relevant issues.

 

  Q: Could you please introduce the overall situation of Taishan Nuclear Power Plant?
  Answer: Taishan Nuclear Power Plant has two EPR (European Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor) nuclear power units, designed by France's Framatome and constructed and operated as a Sino-French joint venture. Since the construction of the Taishan NPP began, the NNSA has always strictly supervised it in accordance with laws and regulations. Unit 1 entered commercial operation on December 13, 2018, and Unit 2 entered commercial operation on September 7, 2019. At present, both units have already begun their second fuel cycle. Since entering commercial operation, the two units at Taishan NPP have been operating safely and stably, and the surrounding environment has not experienced any abnormal situation.

 

  Q: What happened to Taishan NPP?
Answer: Currently, in the operation of Unit 1 of Taishan NPP, the specific radioactivity (i.e. the amount of radioactivity contained in unit volume or weight) of the coolant in the primary loop of the reactor is monitored to have increased, but this level is still in accordance with the technical specifications for the NPP's operations. As long as the operating requirements in the technical specifications are met, the operational safety of the nuclear power plant is guaranteed.

   The increased level of radioactivity in the primary circuit of Unit 1 is mainly related to damaged fuel rods. Due to the influence of uncontrollable factors including fuel manufacturing, transport, loading, etc., a small amount of fuel rod damage is unavoidable in NPP operation, and it is a common phenomenon. According to relevant statistics, many nuclear power plants in the world have experienced fuel rod damage and [were able to] continue operation.
There are more than 60,000 fuel rods in the core of Unit 1 of Taishan NPP. At present, it is estimated that the number of damaged fuel rod claddings is about 5, with the proportion of damaged fuel rods less than 0.01% of the total. This is much lower than the maximum level of damage allowed to the fuel assembly in the design (0.25%).

 

  Q: CNN reported that there was a radioactivity leak at the Taishan Nuclear Power Plant. Is it true?
  Answer: An increase in the level of radioactivity in the primary circuit is completely different from a radioactive leakage accident. The primary circuit is inside the reactor. As long as the pressure boundary of the reactor coolant system and the reactor containment meet the requirements as a radioactivity containment barrier, there is no problem of radioactivity leaking into the environment. These two physical barriers are [currently] safe. At present, the radiation monitoring results from the environment around Taishan NPP show no abnormalities. They are still at the background level, which also indicates that no leakage has occurred.

 

  Q: CNN reported that a shutdown has been avoided because the NNSA approved an increase in the acceptable limit of radiation detection outside the Taishan Nuclear Power Plant. Is it true?
   Answer: This report is not true. The NNSA did not approve an increase in the acceptable limit of radiation detection outside Taishan NPP. The NNSA reviewed and approved the relevant limits for the specific activity of the reactor coolant inert gas in the primary circuit. This was a revision to the technical specifications for chemistry and radiochemistry in Taishan NPP. This limit is used for operations management and is not related to the external radiation detection at the nuclear power plant. The concept [described]in the CNN report is wrong.

 

  Q: What will the National Nuclear Safety Administration do next?
Answer: We will continue to closely monitor the radioactivity level of the primary circuit of Unit 1 of Taishan NPP, strengthen on-site supervision and environmental monitoring; guide and supervise the operator to take measures to strictly control the radioactivity in the primary circuit, and strictly abide by the operating technical specifications to ensure Unit 1 operates safely. At the same time, we will also maintain communication with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the French nuclear safety regulatory authority.

 

-China state-affiliated content-

uredilo bitje Lel
Povezava do prispevka
Sovica reče pred 19 urami:

Pizda tile china chudi so vedno vecji cringe

Kaj točno te jezi? Nisem lepo razložil? Edini razlog zakaj so Francozi kontaktirali Američane glede nuklearke so Ameriške sankcije, a ameriški mediji niso sposobni omeniti niti tega.

 

No saj NYT so celo omenili, samo kaj ko je večina nekritično povzela CNN novico.

 

"According to CNN, Framatome had contacted the U.S. government about getting help with operations at the power plant. CGN, the Chinese nuclear company, is on the U.S. Commerce Department’s so-called Entity List of foreign enterprises with which American companies are forbidden to do business."

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/14/business/china-nuclear-power-problem.html

 

Pa še tu je hecno napisano. Prvič CNN tega ni poročal (lahko si preberite članek na vrhu te strani. Celo čudijo se nad tem zakaj so Francozi kontaktirali Američane: "it is unusual that a foreign company would unilaterally reach out to the American government for help") in drugič bi bolj točno bilo: "Framatome had contacted the U.S. government for PERMISSION to assist with operations at the power plant."

 

To je tudi edina "novica" tu. Tuje države morajo prositi ZDA za dovoljenje pri rutinskih zadevah. Rutinske zadeve ki lahko vplivajo na to kako hitro se stvari razrešijo in obratujejo varno naprej. Velika avtoritarna ZDA.

 

-China state-affiliated content-

uredilo bitje Lel
Povezava do prispevka
bainit reče pred 21 urami:

itak so ga tudi ameri financirali, tako da je del krivde tudi njihov

 

Izvajanje in financiranje raziskav samo po sebi ni sporno. Konc koncev zaradi takšnih raziskav nastane v krizi na horuk cepivo.

 

Po Exxon Valdezu tudi nismo krivili notranjega izgorevanja

Povezava do prispevka
  • 2 tedna kasneje...
Navedek

China's GDP growth is projected to reach 8.5 percent on a yearly basis in 2021, thanks to the pent-up demand and strong exports, according to the World Bank, which updated the economic forecasts in its regional economic report on Tuesday.

It marks an upward revision by 0.6 percentage points from the World Bank's projections in December 2020, largely due to stronger-than-expected foreign demand, it said.

https://www.icis.com/explore/resources/news/2021/06/30/10657726/china-2021-growth-forecast-raised-to-8-5-world-bank

 

Navedek

PARIS, June 25 (Reuters) - An electric car battery plant planned by China's Envision AESC in northern France, billed as a boost to an auto industry in upheaval as some traditional jobs are lost, will create at least new 1,000 positions, a French politician said on Friday.

https://www.reuters.com/business/chinese-battery-investment-france-create-1000-jobs-politician-2021-06-25/

 

 

uredilo bitje AdamSmit
Povezava do prispevka

Happy b'day CPC

 

wGTnuzq.jpg

 

Navedek

It’s 100 years today (30. 6.) since the Communist Party of China (CPC) was first formed by just 50 members, mostly intellectuals, but including railway and mine workers.

 

100 years later, the official membership figure is 95 million and there are 4.8m party branches.

A quarter of the membership is under 35 years; 29% are female

 

uredilo bitje AdamSmit
Povezava do prispevka

To so lahko tudi trojke, kot izhaja še iz ruskih boljševikov iz carističnega obdobja ("trojke" so poznale vse članice kominterne).

 

 

Navedek

A local Party branch can be set up with just three full Party members, according to the CPC’s Constitution.

Pri čemer "local party branch" nekaj na občinski ravni, na ravni tega, čemur bi mi rekli krajevna ali vaška skupnost ali pa v firmi ali pa v oddelku ene firme

 

Navedek

Article30: A primary level Party organization shall be formed in any enterprise, villagers’committee ,government organ, school, research institute, subdistrict and community, social organization, company, People’s Liberation Army, and any other primary-level organization where people work, where there are three or more full Party members.

Navedek

Responsibilities of the local cells include organizing Party activities and carrying out the Party’s instructions and policies at the local level; collecting fees from Party members; recruiting and training new members; and generally representing and defending the interests of the people in their communities.

 

http://www.xinhuanet.com//english/download/Constitution_of_the_Communist_Party_of_China.pdf

Povezava do prispevka

Pridruži se debati

Lahko objaviš prispevek in se registriraš kasneje. Ako imaš račun, se vpiši za objavo s svojim računom.

Gost
Odgovori na temo...

×   Prilepljena vsebina je formatirana.   Odstrani formatiranje pisave

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Tvoja povezava je bila samodejno vpeta..   Namesto tega prikaži kot povezavo

×   Tvoja prejšnja vsebina je bila obnovljena.   Počisti urejevalnik

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Nedavno brska   0 članov

    • Nihče od registriranih uporabnikov ne pregleduje strani.
×
×
  • Ustvari novo...