Skoči na vsebino

Primera Division


ronaldinho

Priporočeni prispevki

kemik reče pred 1 uro:

Rasisticnega ali pa ga ne marajo.

 

Kje je razlika ce si igralec/zaposlen v tej instituciji?

Ni razilike, idiotizem Napolija, samo ma živce mi gre ko se govori o rasizmu samo zato ker je črn, v resnici pa ni bilo zaradi rase. 

 

No vsak niso plačevali novinarjev, da žalijo legende kluba kot v kakšnem drugem klubu. :rofl:

Povezava do prispevka

To je iz iste države, kjer so navijači Interja stali na strani navijačev Cagliarija, po tistem ko so ti skandirali rasistične opazke celo tekmo na račun Dumfriesa in Lukakuja. Cela kultura Italije sloni na temu, da se norčujejo iz vsega in si dostikrat dovolj neki light rasizem na TVju/Youtubu, ni to tko kot v Ameriki, kjer bi nekateri že zganjal dramo.

 

V vsakem primeru so bli zelo smotani do njega, ko mu je verjetno tudi bedno, ker more prenašati Rudi Garcio :D 

Povezava do prispevka
reder reče Dne, 28. 9. 2023 at 15:27:

 

@ronaldinhoa bi to moralo pozitivno vplivati na salary cap pozimi, če kaj bolje razumeš vse skupaj? Ali je vseeno treba počakati na katero nogo bo vstal Tebas?

 

 

 

 

 

Ne pokaže mi tvitta (?), tako da ne vem, za kaj točno gre. 

 

Klub je drugače objavil, da je v sezoni 22/23 pridelal dobrih 300m dobička (po zaslugi palanc), kar je okrog 30m več kot načrtovano.

 

Za to sezono so pa planirani prihodki 859m in 11m profita, čeprav se bo izgubilo precej denarja zaradi igranja na Montjuicu, potem ko so se lani podirali rekordi obiskanosti na Nou Campu.

 

also, Yamal bo jutri podaljšal do 2026. Ker je še mladoleten lahko podpiše največ 3-letno pogodbo, je pa baje z Mendesom že tudi podpisana privatna pogodba in zmenjeno, da bo podaljšal do 2030, ko dopolni 18 let. 

uredilo bitje ronaldinho
Povezava do prispevka

Ti prihodki so že vključeni v lanske bilance, tako da za novo sezono ne bo kaj veliko pomagalo. 

 

Je pa klub tudi objavil, da je podpisal 6 novih sponzorskih pogodb, ki pridejo v veljavo s to sezono za okrog 36m. Ampak tudi te so že zajete v budget za 23/24 in še vseeno ni dovolj, če se vpraša Tebasa. Tako da bo še treba iskati dodatne vire prihodkov in/ali nižati stroške.

 

Največja dilema je s prodajo Barca Studios. 

 

https://www.football-espana.net/2023/10/02/la-liga-put-out-statement-on-barcelona-economic-lever-the-payment-has-not-been-made

Povezava do prispevka

Sem že omenil v greznici pa bom še tu.

 

Sevilla odpustila Mendilibarja, cel kup imen se omenja za potencialno zamenjavo od Iraole (če ga bodo češnje sackale/spustile) preko Marcelina pa tudi do Conteja in AVB. Slednja dva bi bila neumnost in verjetno niti nista realni opciji. Tudi ime Raula sem zasledil, a podobno je bilo tudi pri Villarrealu pa potem ni bilo nič iz tega. Imo bi bilo še najbolj pametno, da bi dali šanso prekaljenemu La Liga trenerju kot je Marcelino, ki bi znal potegnit maksimum iz te ekipe veteranov. Drugo leto bi morali pa konkretno prenovit ekipo, kolikor jim bodo finance dopuščale. Navas, Ramos, Raketa, Fernando, Lamela, Ocampos in Oli Torres so vsi v zadnjem letu pogodb, tako da če bo večina njih šla se bi moralo sprostiti kar veliko denarja pri plačah.

 

Almeria je tudi izbrala novega trenerja in sicer Gaizko Garitana. Precej meh trener, ampak verjetno noben drug noče tja. Škoda, ker ima njihov kader po mojem kar dober potencial z igralci kot Luis Suarez, Ramazani, Arribas, Kaiky in Pubill. Tudi igram trenutno z njimi v FM in smo že v prvi sezoni prišli v CL brez kakšnih večjih sprememb v kadru. 

 

 

Povezava do prispevka

Eduard Romeu, economic vice president of FC Barcelona, completed the closing of the 2022-23 financial year and the 2023-24 budget a few weeks ago, after intense analysis work by the auditing company. Ten days before the ordinary Assembly of delegate members is held, next Saturday the 21st, he attended Mundo Deportivo next to the Palau Blaugrana to review the economic situation of the club, as well as some current aspects.
 

How do you think the Assembly is presented?

 

We have begun to reverse the situation from an economic point of view and we are satisfied because we combine it with important sporting potential.

 

Why telematics?

 

Basically it is a cost issue. If we have established a very austere viability plan in which many great efforts and some painful ones have been made, it did not make much sense to double the cost of an Assembly when it can be done in half. And there is a more social and participation issue: it is a guarantee of greater participation, because access is given to everyone, who does not have to be physically in the place.
 

But it seems that the member can participate more in an in-person Assembly, right?

 

No, it is simply the fact of proximity. On some occasion someone has told me that we are afraid of the partner, but precisely where we gain the most is in the one-on-one, especially the president, who in the one-on-one is infallible.

 

Will Vitor Roque be able to register in January?

 

We'll see how all this evolves. We have two windows, one possible in January and another in June. It will depend on the technical part. As always, we will do everything possible to please the coach, who is in charge of this.

 

If Xavi says he wants Vitor Roque, what does Barcelona need to be able to register him?

 

We have to generate enough fair play and, as we have always said, we will do everything possible and impossible to please the coach, as we have done to date. We are not suspected of not complying with it.

 

We still do not know the financial results in depth, but there is a positive settlement of 304 million, despite the fact that ordinary activity continues to generate more expenses than income. Can you explain why?

 

From the first moment we said that our obsession was to achieve a balance in the budget and that the income was sufficient to meet the expenses. This is the point we have been working towards these two years. Everything has a maturation period and we have used the famous levers, which still have extraordinary results, to reverse the situation and address the commitments and backpacks we brought from the past. We have denounced the figure of 200 million that we once said was a recurring loss each year from the beginning. It is not something new, but it comes from the 2017-18 season, and fortunately we have been able to stop the drain. In the 2023-24 season we are capable of reversing this situation.


That is to say, in the budget that will be presented to the partners there are already benefits in ordinary activity, right?

 

Without the application of levers, of extraordinary ones, we have to be able to obtain a positive result and the budget contemplates it. We will be able to achieve it in record time.

 

It has emerged that there is an accounting income of 200 million euros without having received that money, but that it comes from revaluing Barça Studios. Can you explain it in a way that people understand?

 

We have a company that is 100% owned by the club and we ask the Assembly, and we are authorized, to sell 49%, with the aim of bringing in a series of investors, to give it greater content. Unlike other areas of business, it is a company that does not provide income, unlike other operations, which are painful, such as TV rights. Even the best-known item, the club's television, generated losses. We wanted to give a boost to this business so that it would give us income in the future, this was the purpose. We made an assessment, based on future perspectives if we gave it more content, of how far we could go. Along with other criteria, complex for us, such as the metaverse or NFTs, a valuation of 400 million was made by independent consultants. After approval, we sold 49% and obtained profits of 200 million euros, a part of which has been received and another is pending, according to a schedule. So much for the lever that was requested. Besides, there is an accounting operation: if you have sold half of the product for 200, it means that your half is worth another 200, in this case 208 for 51%. Therefore, following the auditor's recommendations, we generated this as an extraordinary income in the operating account.


Do you understand that it can be considered accounting makeup?

 

If you do it, certain people will say that it is a wonderful operation of financial engineering. It turns out that we do it and it seems that we are making a wrong transaction. Well no, we are valuing what we really have.

 

If in the end Libero does not pay, what impact will it have on the income statement?

 

There are two aspects here: Libero has not entered everything, among other aspects, because he did not intend to carry out such a quick operation; It was more of an interest of the club to link an income, a medium or long-term investment, for a business activity that would simultaneously serve us to generate financial fair play, which would benefit us with a space to register players. We put pressure, but when you put pressure, the other party asks for a return. We could have entered Libero's part without any problem, but they asked for additional compensation that was not good for the club from a business perspective. Now they asked us to continue calmly with payments in the last quarter of the year and we have granted it.


Are there alternatives?

 

If the payment does not occur we have other possibilities from very interested groups, but whoever has to decide the goodness of what and when the club is, no investor can set the conditions for us.

 

If the entire amount was charged, was the intention to ask the Assembly for permission for Barça Studios to be listed on the stock market?

 

It was a possibility, but in that particular case Libero imposed it if the payment was made before the date we had in mind.
 

What does going public mean?

 

In some way, we think that it may be good for the club to access markets that give a real appreciation of the company; That is, the market is sovereign in giving a value. And we can finance ourselves to give content and greater speed to this year's investments. It's not that it's a bad option, it's just not the time. Nobody has to condition us.

 

Doesn't it have to imply a future conversion of Barça into SA in the future?

 

No, we are also talking about a business that is not 'core' of Barça. It is a business that did not generate, that did not provide income. We are not taking income away from the club's ordinary activity, but rather it is a parallel business. It is not the FC Barcelona that is listed on the stock market. It is a company owned by FC Barcelona.
 

Can you do a quick review of settlement 22-23?

 

Let's compare what we said in the budget with what has been settled. We said there would be income of 1,255 million and we have obtained 1,259. 4 more. There has been a negative part in TV income, due to the premature eliminations in the Champions League and Europa League, largely offset by the increases in Stadium and the commercial part. The impact of the eliminations in Europe in the end was 25 million euros. There has also been less income from transfers than expected, for example, 20 million difference for Griezmann.

 

And in expenses?

 

We had budgeted 1,065 million and we obtained 1,165. We spent 100 more. Next come corporate taxes and the purely financial issue. Why are there 100 million more expenses? There has been an increase of 20 million euros in sports salaries, compared to what was budgeted; non-sports salaries at 3 million euros; management expenses 11 million euros; and there are other expenses, linked to more income, such as production expenses. Additionally, we have provisioned 100 million euros in this year, since we had had 208 million for the participation in Bridgeburg (Barça Vision). It is a counterlever, expenses for future fruit that we could have as a result of the backpacks of the past. For example, Alba, Umtiti, Mirotic or other players.
 

Piqué has forgiven, right?

 

Piqué is a separate case. The important thing is that we charge this amount (to exercise 22-23) and free ourselves from future backpacks.
 

Let's go to budget 23-24

 

The viability plan, which the president commissioned me and the executives have executed, is taking shape. We present income of 859 million, ordinary income from the club's activity. They entail a reduction of 78 million euros in the stadium, due to the climb to Montjuïc; 28 million more Media, because we are convinced that we will reach these Champion levels; At a commercial level, 27 million compared to the previous year, which already had a significant increase. It is an ambitious goal, but we have many agreements and contracts signed. And there are 377 million less than in the previous season because there are no levers.
 

And expense?

 

We aim for 832 million. The big reduction is in sports salaries, we reduced it by 184 million, with a very deaf work.

 

Is it where you have dedicated the most energy?

 

Yes, it is the most relevant game of the club. Non-sports salaries are also reduced by 2 million; management expenses drop by 50 million; and other expenses drop by 98. Deducted from the financial result and with a much smaller corporate tax because the profit is lower, it points to a positive result. The figure we can present is not as relevant as improving the budget we present. It is ambitious, but we laid the foundations to ratify the viability plan.
 

In what year was the budget balance contemplated?

 

We ask for four years of patience to be able to reverse the club's situation at the income statement level.

 

And the debt?

 

I also feel proud to have lowered it. It was a slab, both in the criteria established by LaLiga and in our more rigorous criteria. From 1,350 we are around 1,200, with which a good job has been done. With LaLiga criteria, this is the second year that we have reduced debt. In any case, we asked the partner for four years of patience, telling him that we would try to be competitive athletically in the second year, because we have to combine it. In the second year we already managed to win a title like the League.

 

Are Espai Barça's construction permits immediate?

 

We are on the right path, we trust to have it imminently. And we are 'on time', we have no delays. I am convinced that there will be good news soon.

 

Jaume Roures said that the Camp Nou would not be ready in 2024

 

I listened to the debate. He said he wouldn't be there, but that's the same thing we said. That is, in 2024 the field will not be completely finished, when we return at the end of the 24th we will build a stadium with a capacity of around 60%. At full occupancy and performance of the stadium, in summer 2026.
 

That is, the 125th anniversary, for now, at the Camp Nou...

 

Yes, the intention is for it to be so.

 

The repayment of the stadium loan is not yet contemplated in this year's budget, right?

 

No, when the stadium is completely completed, but in any case that is the debt that worries me the least, because we are not going to be different from the vast majority of clubs that have done this work and whose income has increased by 200 %. That is, the projections are optimistic. My occupation is ordinary debt, which Espai Barça must also serve to place at an optimal point. And allow me another point, we are talking about a revaluation, but what if we revalue today's squad compared to the one we found? We had a squad that was very difficult to place, due to a question of salary burden. Today we have a completely remodeled team of young people with market salary levels, with very desirable players.
 

A new attack by the Treasury against Barcelona has appeared, regarding the payment to agents in the 2015-18 period. Does this accusation have any basis?

 

Justice ruled in our favor, therefore we were released. The Treasury insists on another route, we have well defined this route and we think that it will not prosper. But, even if they are unrelated issues, it is something that must be faced. It is something that affects many clubs, because many clubs did it in the same way, therefore I understand that it will not prosper either and that they will prove us right again.
 

Povezava do prispevka

Diego Alonso nov trener Seville, nazadnje je bil selektor Urugvaja na SP, pred tem je tudi vodil Inter Miami, najdlje časa pa preživel v Mehiki pri Pachuci. Zelo rizična izbira glede na to, da nima nobenih trenerskih izkušenj v Evropi, je pa igral v La Ligi na začetku tega stoletja za Valencio, najboljšo sezono pa imel pri Atletih, ko je dal 22 golov v Segundi 2001-02. 

Povezava do prispevka

Še Balde se je poškodoval. Bil menjan ob polčasu tekme s Škotsko in že zapustil reprezentančni tabor. Upam, da ni hujšega, ker res nočem gledati Malonsa na El Clasicu.

 

Ob poškodbi Koundeja verjetno tudi odpade opcija, da bi igrali Cancela na LB ter Arauja na RB, ker bi potem moral na CB Inigo, ki je pa zaenkrat odigral samo en polčas in je še tudi čisto zarjavel. Če bi pa že moral izbirat imam pa še vedno rajši njega kot Alonsa. Ali pa kapetana na RB proti Viniju. :rofl: 

 

 

Ni slabo, če je res, čeprav zelo verjetno običajne bučke ob reprezentančnem premour in še vedno pričakujem, da bo podaljšal z Baski. 

 

 

Na LW imamo kar nekaj opcij drugo leto.

 

Nico zastonj?

Ansu vrnitev po posoji? 

Felix - sem bral, da bo Atletico zahteval 80m, ampak imo bi Mendes verjetno lahko izpogajal za okrog 60-70m. Sicer je dobro začel, a ne verjamem, da je vreden toliko.

Olmo - spet se ga je omenjalo nekaj dni nazaj, baje ima klavzulo 60m in ga Xavi hoče (itak želi vse povprečne španske igralce, nič novega). Meni je sicer bolj všeč od Ferrana, a če že imamo slednjega v klubu ni potrebe še za nakup prvega.

 

Sicer dvomim, da bomo sposobni karkoli resnega investirat, če pa že bo kaj denarja na voljo mora biti prioriteta sigurno DM. Sam bi prodal vsaj enega od dvojice Raphinha/Ferran (prvi ima verjetno večji trg v EPL in bi mogoče tudi sprejel kakšno ponudbo iz SA), podpisal Nica in dal Ansuju še eno šanso po upajmo da dobri posoji v Brightonu. Kolikor sem gledal ga zaenkrat RDZ tudi uporablja v dokaj podobni vlogi kot Xavi Felixa. Bomo videli, kako bo v nadaljevanju sezone. Pričakujem pa, da ga bo klub še vseeno probal prodat, edino vprašanje, kakšne ponudbe bomo dobili in če bo mulc sprejel dokončen odhod.

 

Tudi ne bi bil nasproten odhodu Poljaka v SA, če Roque pride že januarja in se hitro adaptira, ampak pričakujem, da bo ostal še eno leto.

 

Torej nekaj takega:

 

Nico/Ansu - Lewa/Roque - Yamal/Ferran (Raphinha)

 

 

 

uredilo bitje ronaldinho
Povezava do prispevka
  • 2 tedna kasneje...

Lewandowski and Frenkie are not yet ruled out for Saturday's game. This morning they have already participated in the rondos, although the rest of the training they have done individually. Raphinha has even played a little game. @fansjavimiguel

 

Raphinha is training with the group and will be at the Clásico. @Luis_F_Rojo
 

Povezava do prispevka

Pridruži se debati

Lahko objaviš prispevek in se registriraš kasneje. Ako imaš račun, se vpiši za objavo s svojim računom.

Gost
Odgovori na temo...

×   Prilepljena vsebina je formatirana.   Odstrani formatiranje pisave

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Tvoja povezava je bila samodejno vpeta..   Namesto tega prikaži kot povezavo

×   Tvoja prejšnja vsebina je bila obnovljena.   Počisti urejevalnik

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Nedavno brska   0 članov

    • Nihče od registriranih uporabnikov ne pregleduje strani.
×
×
  • Ustvari novo...