Vojna tretjega sveta

[kmjr]

bleachedagnus reče pred 11 minutami:

Logična poteza zdaj bi bila začet odpirat rudnike po eu, začet s frackingom in tako naprej. Pol ne bi bili odvisni niti od Rusije, niti zda, niti savdske arabije,... 

 

Valda to nekaterim ne diši. 

 

fracking se meni ne zdi dobra ideja v nobenem pogledu, to glede rudnikov se strinjam

najbrž so nemci predlagali enomesečno prepoved, da lažje prepričajo svojo javnost, da je treba domače rudnike zalaufat (ugibam), vseeno pa niso porušili vseh mostov, če bo javnost proti

 

čez en mesec al podaljšajo trajno al umaknejo prepoved, imo

 

 

[kmjr]

Včeraj sem pred spanjem bral, da naj bi bile precejšnje zaloge litija v Donbasu oziroma ob Azovskem morju. Morda je bila to dodatna spodbuda rusom. Ve kdo kaj več? 

[WhitWhip]

Pobijanje vojnih ujetnikov je najslabše, kar lahko delaš. Ne samo zaradi etičnih razlogov, ampak tudi strateških. Ko se to razve, se ti ne bo noben hotel predati. Če je namen demoralizacija nasprotne strani, češ da jim vzameš voljo do boja, se v bistvu močno ušteješ. Dezertirat se bojijo zaradi povračilnih ukrepov doma, predati se ti pa tudi ne bo noben hotel. Iz morebitnih šlev delaš junake.

[WhitWhip]

kmjr reče pred 6 minutami:

Včeraj sem pred spanjem bral, da naj bi bile precejšnje zaloge litija v Donbasu oziroma ob Azovskem morju. Morda je bila to dodatna spodbuda rusom. Ve kdo kaj več? 

Za litij ne vem, ampak nahajališča zemeljskega plina ob obali Črnega morja so definitivno eden izmed razlogov. Če bi bil Krim še ukrajinski, bi vse to padlo pod njihovo ekskluzivno morsko ekonomsko cono in bi oni odločali, kaj se dogaja tam. Z litijem je najbrž podobno. Pač še ena izmed iskanih surovin, ki bi ob zmagi padla pod tvoj nadzor.

7. april 2022 uredilo bitje WhitWhip

[kmjr]

Litij se načeloma iz zemlje pridobiva z nekim kemičnim procesom, tako da je najbrž na kopnem. Neki minerali v glavnem, pa ni težkih kovin a la svinec, cink, kadmij (kar naj bi bila pri nahajališčih litija redkost). Nimam pojma o tem, so se pa določena ekološka in druga gibanja v Srbiji sprecializirala za to in so pisali o tem. Ni moje področje. Je pa litij precej iskana roba, če prav štekam, zaradi touch screenov. 

[bainit]

tut litij majo, samo tega je načeloma dosti tudi drugje

tisto v srbiji je pa zaenkrat on hold, čaka na manj teške čase

[kmjr]

Zakaj je bla pol taka fama okoli tega, da ga primanjkuje in je zato drag, crni @bainite 

 

v Nemčiji naj bi ga bilo precej, ma so neki okoljevarstveniki proti 

[tyne]

 

[WhitWhip]

kmjr reče pred 45 minutami:

Litij se načeloma iz zemlje pridobiva z nekim kemičnim procesom, tako da je najbrž na kopnem. Neki minerali v glavnem, pa ni težkih kovin a la svinec, cink, kadmij (kar naj bi bila pri nahajališčih litija redkost). Nimam pojma o tem, so se pa določena ekološka in druga gibanja v Srbiji sprecializirala za to in so pisali o tem. Ni moje področje. Je pa litij precej iskana roba, če prav štekam, zaradi touch screenov. 

Ne sej to ziher je na kopnem sem mal bolj splosno odgovarjal, da ne vpliva tok najbrz na grand scheme of things samo vidim, da te bolj detajli zanimajo.

[zzarafrustra]

tyne reče pred 29 minutami:

 

Does the Russian far-right have political prospects? It already is a fascist state.

 

 

278

 

2,433

 

14.2K

 

 

 

in zapiram tekst

[manakiin]

Enterprise reče Dne, 7. 3. 2022 at 13:37:

rubelj je zgubil 50 postov vrednosti napram evru/dolarju v dveh tednih, ampak za nase rusofile to ni nic v primerjavi s strasansko inflacijo tukaj.

 

k sreci je zahod spoznal da za zelo majhno ceno (na lastni kozi) lahko rusijo sesuje, dokler delujemo vsi, koordinirano.

 

7. april 2022 uredilo bitje manakiin

[MikeHunt]

zzarafrustra reče pred 2 urama:

Does the Russian far-right have political prospects? It already is a fascist state.

 

 

278

 

2,433

 

14.2K

 

 

 

in zapiram tekst

 

"person of colour" baba iz afganistana, lol

 

LP

[Aktivist Vanč]

Dead cat bounce.

[╭∩╮ S<3NEC]

kmjr reče pred 4 urami:

Je pa litij precej iskana roba, če prav štekam, zaradi touch screenov.

Zaradi baterij, ki bi jih radi imeli v prav vsakem avtu. V kombinaciji z obnovljivimi viri pa zelo verjetno še po domovih in nasploh elektrodistribuciji.

[ana]

Še dobro, da se Rusi nazaj držijo. 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/07/russian-soldiers-discussed-killing-civilians-in-radio-intercepts

[mutiranec]

Significant losses of troops.

 

Navedek

Regarding Putin, nukes, and other WMDS:

1.) There are no 'tactical' and 'strategic' nukes. That's babbling for such clueless idiots like Trump. All nukes are 'strategic' and 'political' weapons. Considering latest experiences with Putin, their deployment would change everything - including signal to the NATO that all the gloves are off, and that one can't sit, wait and hope for the best any more. That's where the NATO wouldn't wait for anybody to capitulate, but convert Moscow - or at least certain parts of the Ural mountains - into a nuclear wasteland. That much about this topic (i.e. I'll not even go into doubts about operationality of the mass of Russian nukes; involvement of too many people in a too complex chain of command, and the disfunctionality of the same etc.).

2.) Even Peskov (de-facto Putin's spox) has meanwhile made it clear: nukes only in the case of existential threat for the Russian Federation. A defeat in the war with Ukraine might become an existential threat for Putler-regime, but not for Russia.

3.) Most importantly: Putin is bluffing with nukes all the time. He's as scared as Saddam and Q, and so - just like both of them - so horny to rule that he's going to end like one of them, too. Such jerks never use any nukes (just like Saddam never used his CWs against the US-led coalition in 1991). Putin's letting other babblers around him babble about nukes, and sometimes he's babbling about nukes, too. One way or the other, that's all his usual 'TV-appearance'. Matter of fact is: even when he has ordered that 'nuclear alert', back on... was it 28 February or what? - his nuclear forces remained in their barracks. And his subs in their ports. I.e. his babbling was not supported by actions.

....and why should he do more - if already that was perfectly enough to cause a near-panic and special meetings in Brüssels?

4.) Chemical weapons: by now, Putin has learned two important lessons from this war: since aggression on Ukraine, his usual PRBS is not working withe the NATO any more. Nobody serious is buying it any more. And, lesson No. 2: the West is excellently informed about his intentions about 4-12 hours after he issues any kind of orders (actually, 'directives', then Putin never dares issuing any kind of firm orders: just vague directives, so that later on he is never to blame, but the receiver of his directives is). So much so, Biden & Co are de-facto announcing his intentions before Putin can actually realise these.

Thus, Putin's going to think not 'three' times before ordering their deployment - but 7-8 times, and even that only in the case where he might decide to use nukes instead. Alone the fact the NATO has reacted to 'Bucha massacre' (which, as the BND has revealed via der Spiegel today, was ordered from above) - by starting to deliver heavy armament to Ukraine, has taught him his third important lesson of this war: the only reply to additional of his blackmails nowadays is yet more weaponry for Ukraine. This is going to become even more obvious in the coming weeks, as ever more of such massacres (for example in Kherson, not to talk about Melitupol and Mariupol) become known. The more evidence there is for these being ordered from above (i.e. by Putin) and organised and run from above, too - the more advanced arms is Ukraine going to get.

Thus, forget such nonsense like 'tactical nukes are Putin's blahblah'. That's stories for little kids, and idiots like Trump.

Putin is going to continue running a 'cheap' war as long as he can. Not because he can 'produce guns and butter', but because this is a) what he can afford for long, and b) he's got no other options left. He's not going to start spending 'his' money (i.e. his annual cut from Russian income) to finance this war: the war must continue 'financing itself', through oil, gas, and choal exports. And, the more time passes by, the less is Russia going to earn - alone because sooner or later so many massacres are going to become known that even Germany and Austria will have to be forced to impose a related embargo; and because Putin is far too incompetent and corrupt but to organise any kind of replacements for such customers - on time. And when that happens, PutIn's going to become unable to continue financing the war. (No doubt, in turn, that's playing into his hand, because it's rallying Russians around his flag. From his POV, the only good from this war...)

Precisely the prevention of such a situation (Putin running out of Russian money to continue waging a war) is why he's not announcing a general mobilisation. He can't afford one (i.e. is not willing to spend 'his' money to run one). Already now, sanctions imposed upon Russia are enough to cause major problems. So also for the RFA. For example: on this 1 April - every 1st in month is the payday in the RFA - many of units deployed in Ukraine haven't got their pays for April: they've got promises for additional days off instead. To avoid such problems, Putin's going to continue mobilising this or that oblast, one after the other, or 4-5 at the time, but never all of them at the same time - because Russia neither has the money for more, nor equipment. For example, it turned out that out of 11,000-12,000 MBTs of the RFA, less than 3,500 were operational at the start of this war. And the condition of these 3,500 is so questionable, they never used more than about 1,000 at the time: the 'operational' third, which was then rotated through companies and battalions of the same regiment and/or brigade.

Meanwhile, the RFA lost something like 20% of that figure, and Russia can't manufacture more (because it run out of necessary electronics; and, even while it still could, the quality of products was poor due to all the corruption and lifting of materials and money). I.e. sooner or later we're going to start seeing old T-72s, then reconditioned T-62s, and then T-55s in Ukraine....

Precisely that is why Putin is currently pushing the RFA into attack - 'like mad': to grab as much of Ukraine as he can, before the RFA definitely runs out of steam, tanks, and artillery, and can't advance any more. Why? Because defending with 'millions armed with pitchforks' is possible. As long as there are enough mines and explosives for bobby-traps and IEDs around (as demonstrated by the Houthis in Yemen for 6 years meanwhile, too).

But, advancing in that fashion is not. Besides, the Russians are not as mad as to let themselves get massacred by millions while being rushed into some sort of 'human wave tactics' in Ukraine. If nothing else: they've got no Bushido Codex.

Tom Cooper
Editor, ACIG.info
Series Editor, @War series
Helion & Co.

 

8. april 2022 uredilo bitje mutiranec

[Kruz]

uh, končno smo spet pri Ruska vojska se je že zlomila

 

also

 

 

 

Irski predstavnik Clare Daly:

Navedek

You can dismiss the history of your continent, but we share it with Russia. History has taught us that sanctions do not stop military conflicts. They don't bring peace. They make the people suffer, not the oligarchs, the people, the people of Russia, the people of Europe.

 

8. april 2022 uredilo bitje Vrhovni_Plenum_OF

[Berbasecks]

Dobra izjava, sej isto je s tem blokiranjem EU denarja za Madžarsko/Poljsko (al pa k se je vmes omenjala Slovenija). Kazen za ljudstvo, ne oblast ...

[kmjr]

Berbasecks reče pred 1 uro:

Dobra izjava, sej isto je s tem blokiranjem EU denarja za Madžarsko/Poljsko (al pa k se je vmes omenjala Slovenija). Kazen za ljudstvo, ne oblast ...

 

Hm, niti ne. Oblast si podporo ljudstva v revnejših EU državah kupuje predvsem s projekti (in krajami) realiziranimi z EU denarjem. Iz tega se napajajo elite in s tem se zagotavlja prebivalcem "modernizacijo" in te fore. EU denar za Poljsko/Madžarsko odtehta vse ostalo. Plus random Poljak/Madžar lahko gre živet in delat kamorkoli v EU, rus ravno ne

[Wallux]

mutiranec reče pred 2 urama:

Significant losses of troops.

 

1.) There are no 'tactical' and 'strategic' nukes. That's babbling for such clueless idiots like Trump. All nukes are 'strategic' and 'political' weapons.

 

Pa kje si tega idiota najdu? Mora Trumpa omenjat, drugače ni srečen.

 

Pol sem šu mal po CNN strani kaj pišejo. Pizda je to prizadeta ustanova. En blesov članek za drugim.

[kmjr]

Drugače, umrl je ruski Drnovšek aka Zelenski aka Bernard Brščič, v Rusiji znan pod priimkom Žirinovski - od 1992 do smrti je vodil ruski LDS, ultranacionalistično (beri: centristično) stranko  

[Wallux]

kmjr reče pred 1 minuto:

Drugače, umrl je ruski Drnovšek aka Zelenski aka Bernard Brščič, v Rusiji znan pod priimkom Žirinovski - od 1992 do smrti je vodil ruski LDS, ultranacionalistično (beri: centristično) stranko  

 

Ti si tut ruski Drnovšek, ja. Še eno tako...      pa boš vidu boga. 

[zzarafrustra]

Wallux reče pred 16 minutami:

 

Pa kje si tega idiota najdu? Mora Trumpa omenjat, drugače ni srečen.

 

Pol sem šu mal po CNN strani kaj pišejo. Pizda je to prizadeta ustanova. En blesov članek za drugim.

taktične nuke so primarno namenjene uničevanju recimo tankvskih bataljonov  pa recimo bunkerjev- recimo ena taktičnaa nuka bi zelo omejila ruske zmožnosti pred vojno. taktična nuka na un konvoj isto. je pa res, da v tej vojni gledamo bolj neke manjše operacije. tole v donbassu pa zna nekako zadostiti za taktično nukanje. 

 

tu gre za neko zgodovinsko pogojeno demonizacijo nuklearnega orožja. verjetno je nuka celo najbolj humano orožje od vseh ker te pač preprosto ni. 

8. april 2022 uredilo bitje zzarafrustra

[ana]

Vrhovni_Plenum_OF reče pred 1 uro:

uh, končno smo spet pri Ruska vojska se je že zlomila

 

also

 

 

 

Irski predstavnik Clare Daly:

 

Očitno je njeno stališče odvisno glede na to ali gre Žide ali ne.

8. april 2022 uredilo bitje ana

[Wallux]

zzarafrustra reče pred 14 minutami:

taktične nuke so primarno namenjene uničevanju recimo tankvskih bataljonov - recimo ena taktičnaa nuka bi zelo omejila ruske zmožnosti pred vojno. taktična nuka na un konvoj isto. je pa res, da v tej vojni gledamo bolj neke manjše operacije. tole v donbassu pa zna nekako zadostiti za taktično nukanje. 

 

tu gre za neko zgodovinsko pogojeno demonizacijo nuklearnega orožja. verjetno je nuka celo najbolj humano orožje od vseh ker te pač preprosto ni. 

Ja. Maš taktične za uničenje večje skupine vojske na enem kupu. In pol maš strateške, ko radiraš cela mesta.

Sej, novinarji pri CNN so itak totalni idioti.

 

Je humana, če si direkt pod njo ali v bližini. Če si pa bolj stran, potem pa lahko umiraš zelo počasne smrti in v agoniji.

8. april 2022 uredilo bitje Wallux

[Aktivist Vanč]

Zaraf, če bi bil predsednik, bi ustanovil mednarodno gibanje za de-demonizacijo nukic.

 

Pravica za nukice!

8. april 2022 uredilo bitje tomazek

[zzarafrustra]

tomazek reče Pravkar:

Zaraf, če bi bil predsednik, bi ustanovil mednarodno gibanje za de-demonizacijo nukic.

Ne. kar pravim je, da se bo slej kot prej nekdo spomnil da uporaba taktičnih nukic ni nič manj grozljiva kot zaplinjevanja ali pa neke termo(pozabu besedo) bmbe. 

[WhitWhip]

A kdo mogoče kej ve o "children safaris", ki naj bi se dogajali v Mariupolu? Baje, da so se vojaki, najbrž čečeni, kratkočasili na tak način. A ma kdo kake vire, dokaze? Sam ne znam najti.

8. april 2022 uredilo bitje WhitWhip

[mutiranec]

Wallux reče pred 1 uro:

 

Pa kje si tega idiota najdu? Mora Trumpa omenjat, drugače ni srečen.

 

Pol sem šu mal po CNN strani kaj pišejo. Pizda je to prizadeta ustanova. En blesov članek za drugim.

Ima posebno razmerje z njim. Ta "idiot" je eden izmed najboljši vojaški pisecv zadnjih 30 let.

[tyne]

Padel še ban na ruski premog. So Nemci pozabili pogledat cene štroma.